BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T010000
RDATE:20260308T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:America/New_York EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261101T010000
RDATE:20270314T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:America/New_York EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20271107T010000
RDATE:20280312T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:America/New_York EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20281105T010000
RDATE:20290311T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:America/New_York EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250331T100000
RDATE:20251102T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:America/New_York EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260308T030000
RDATE:20261101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:America/New_York EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20270314T030000
RDATE:20271107T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:America/New_York EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20280312T030000
RDATE:20281105T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:America/New_York EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:0a6d970d06a5856041b4184078625e52
CATEGORIES:Lean Seminar
CREATED:20260330T141754
SUMMARY:From solving formal systems to building theories (and back) 
LOCATION:Hill 705
DESCRIPTION:A famous essay by Gowers, “The two cultures of mathematics”, highlights a c
 ontrast between two attitudes towards mathematics: the problem-solving view
  where the point of “understanding” is to improve one’s ability to tackle p
 roblems, and the theory-building angle that sees the point of solving probl
 ems as improving one’s understanding (and mathematical theories). AI, for m
 athematics and arguably most domains, largely focuses on problem-solving gi
 ven an existing background theory, but building theories themselves is comp
 arably underexplored. This talk will consider what theory building can look
  like in two AI systems. First, we will consider the problem of tactic indu
 ction: given a set of formal proofs, find high-level tactics that simplify 
 them, as measured by a compression objective. We’ll consider both a case st
 udy on learning tactics from educational algebra problems from Khan Academy
 , as well as tactics in the Rocq theorem prover. Learned tactics reveal dom
 ain-specific patterns in solutions and we show that they can help LLM-based
  provers. Then, we will describe ongoing work on Formal Disco, an open-ende
 d system where complete new verified programs, from ideation to specificati
 on, implementation and proofs, are synthesized by LLM agents. Using open mo
 dels over 10 days, our system generated the largest dataset of verified pro
 grams in the Dafny language to date, and we show how the data is useful to 
 improve models at verification-relevant tasks, such as annotating methods w
 ith assertions and loops invariants. Although the evaluations of both syste
 ms will focus on pragmatic tasks, we will speculate further on implications
  of more powerful automated theory building systems.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<div dir="ltr" style="border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 400; fo
 nt-size: 15px; line-height: inherit; font-family: 'Segoe UI', 'Segoe UI Web
  (West European)', -apple-system, 'system-ui', Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sa
 ns-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: #2424
 24; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px
 ; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; white-space: normal; 
 background-color: #ffffff;"><span data-olk-copy-source="MessageBody" style=
 "border: 0px; font: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: bas
 eline; color: black; background-color: white;">A famous essay by Gowers, “T
 he two cultures of mathematics”, highlights a contrast between two attitude
 s towards mathematics: the problem-solving view where the point of “underst
 anding” is to improve one’s ability to tackle problems, and the<span>&nbsp;
 </span></span><span style="border: 0px; font: inherit; margin: 0px; padding
 : 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: inherit; background-color: white;">
 theory-building</span><span style="border: 0px; font: inherit; margin: 0px;
  padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: black; background-color: wh
 ite;">&nbsp;angle that sees the point of solving problems as improving one’
 s understanding (and mathematical theories). AI, for mathematics and arguab
 ly most domains, largely focuses on problem-solving given an existing backg
 round theory, but building theories themselves is comparably underexplored.
  This talk will consider what theory building can look like in two AI syste
 ms. First, we will consider the problem of tactic induction:<span>&nbsp;</s
 pan></span><span style="border: 0px; font: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0
 px; vertical-align: baseline; color: inherit; background-color: white;">giv
 en a set of formal proofs, find high-level tactics that simplify them, as m
 easured by a compression objective. We’ll consider both a case study on lea
 rning tactics from educational algebra problems from Khan Academy, as well 
 as tactics in the Rocq theorem prover.</span><span style="border: 0px; font
 : inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; color: blac
 k; background-color: white;">&nbsp;Learned tactics reveal domain-specific p
 atterns in solutions and we show that they can help LLM-based provers. Then
 , we will describe ongoing work on Formal Disco, an open-ended system where
  complete new verified programs, from ideation to specification, implementa
 tion and proofs, are synthesized by LLM agents. Using open models over 10 d
 ays, our system generated the largest dataset of verified programs in the D
 afny language to date, and we show how the data is useful to improve models
  at verification-relevant tasks, such as&nbsp;annotating methods with asser
 tions and loops&nbsp;invariants. Although the evaluations of both systems w
 ill focus on pragmatic tasks, we will speculate further on&nbsp;implication
 s of more powerful automated theory building systems.</span></div>
CONTACT:Gabriel Poesia
DTSTAMP:20260828T001806
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260401T100000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260401T110000
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR