Errata for Everyday Mathematics

I am keeping track of the little mistakes I find as I go along.

From the parents' handbook: "Regular polyhedron: A polyhedron with all faces the same shape and same size. There are five regular polyhedrons: tetrahedron: 4 faces, each formed by an equilateral triangle cube: 6 faces, each formed by a square. octahedron: 8 faces, each formed by an equilateral triangle. dodecahedron: 12 faces, each formed by a regular pentagon icosahedron: 20 faces, each formed by an equilateral triangle." There are actually two mistakes here: first, in this definition a bipyramid would also be a regular polyhedron, which it is not. Second, it should say "There are five regular convex polyhedra." The first has been fixed in the most recent edition, but not the second. If the definition doesn't have convex in it, there are more; for the right classification try wikipedia .

From an answer key: "There are more than 75 ways of finding change for 50 cents." Actually, there are 50 ways. Apparently, the same incorrect answer key has been distributed for years, and the mistake on the answer key has gotten countless parents involved with their children's homework! Perhaps it was planted on purpose? :)

From answers to frequently asked questions: " The learning of the algorithms of arithmetic has been, until recently, the core of mathematics programs in elementary schools. There were good reasons for this. It was necessary that students have reliable, accurate methods to do arithmetic by hand, for everyday life, business, and to support further study in mathematics and science. s society demands more from its citizens than knowledge of basic arithmetic skills. Our students are confronted with a world in which mathematical proficiency is essential for success. There is general agreement among mathematics educators that drill on paper/pencil algorithms should receive less emphasis, and that more emphasis be placed on areas like geometry, measurement, data analysis, probability and problem solving, and that students be introduced to these subjects using realistic problem contexts. The use of technology, including calculators, does not diminish the need for basic knowledge, but does provide children with opportunities to explore and expand their problem solving capabilities beyond what their pencil-and-paper arithmetic skills may allow." Actually there is a lot of debate about this among "math educators".

Back to my homepage .